By way of further elucidating the logic of the three theoretical perspectives we're been wrestling with, I would like you to take one of the following two empirical questions and see what one or two of the perspectives would say about it:
1) the UN recently decided, according to reports like this one (http://www.space.com/news/united-nations-alien-ambassador-100927.html), to appoint an ambassador in case of alien contact. Is this a good idea?
2) the Bretton Woods system itself has undergone such radical changes that some would say that it no longer even exists. Is this a good thing?
Feel free to tackle both if you can find a creative way of combining them ;-)
No comments:
Post a Comment